{"id":9524,"date":"2026-11-05T16:36:12","date_gmt":"2026-11-05T14:36:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/?p=9524"},"modified":"2026-11-05T16:36:12","modified_gmt":"2026-11-05T14:36:12","slug":"castig-definitiv-in-materia-raspunderii-patrimoniale-a-functionarilor-publici","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/castig-definitiv-in-materia-raspunderii-patrimoniale-a-functionarilor-publici\/","title":{"rendered":"C\u00e2\u015ftig definitiv \u00een materia r\u0103spunderii patrimoniale a func\u0163ionarilor publici"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"x_MsoNormal\" data-olk-copy-source=\"MessageBody\">Curtea de Apel T\u00e2rgu Mure\u0219 a respins ast\u0103zi printr-o decizie definitiv\u0103, recursul declarat de c\u0103tre o unitate administrativ-teritorial\u0103, \u00eempotriva sentin\u021bei pronun\u021bate de Tribunalul Harghita prin care s-a dispus anularea unei dispozi\u021bii de imputare emis\u0103 cu scopul angaj\u0103rii r\u0103spunderii patrimoniale a unor func\u021bionari publici, din cadrul aparatului de specialitate a Primarului UAT, motivul principal al anul\u0103rii fiind acela c\u0103 acestea au fost emise tardiv fa\u021b\u0103 de momentul cunoa\u0219terii pagubei de c\u0103tre administra\u021bia public\u0103 local\u0103.<\/p>\n<p class=\"x_MsoNormal\">Prin actul administrativ atacat, autoritatea public\u0103 \u00a0a stabilit \u00een sarcina unor persoane fizice, func\u021bionari publici, obliga\u021bia de plat\u0103 a unor desp\u0103gubiri, \u00een valoare de aprox. 3,5 milioane de lei, reduse ulterior, pornind de la cuantumul unor penalit\u0103\u021bi de \u00eent\u00e2rziere calculate asupra unor debite care proveneau dintr-un contract de achizi\u021bii publice \u00eencheiat UAT \u0219i o firm\u0103 privat\u0103.<\/p>\n<p class=\"x_MsoNormal\">Instan\u021bele de judecat\u0103 au re\u021binut c\u0103 dispozi\u021biile de imputare a debitelor \u00eempotriva func\u021bionarilor publici, au fost emise dup\u0103 expirarea termenului de dec\u0103dere de 30 de zile prev\u0103zut de art. 500 alin. (1) din Codul administrativ \u0219i c\u0103 termenul curge de la data pronun\u021b\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rii judec\u0103tore\u0219ti prin care autoritatea public\u0103 a fost obligat\u0103 la plata unor penalit\u0103\u021bi de \u00eent\u00e2rziere \u0219i nu de la un moment subiectiv, cum este data \u00eentocmirii unei note de calcul interne la nivelul administra\u021biei.<\/p>\n<p class=\"x_MsoNormal\" aria-hidden=\"true\">\n<p class=\"x_MsoNormal\">Clien\u021bii au fost reprezenta\u021bi cu succes de echipa format\u0103 din av. Raluca Moldovan-Colcieri, av. R\u0103zvan Racol\u021ba \u0219i av. Theodor Goje.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Curtea de Apel T\u00e2rgu Mure\u0219 a respins ast\u0103zi printr-o decizie definitiv\u0103, recursul declarat de c\u0103tre o unitate administrativ-teritorial\u0103, \u00eempotriva sentin\u021bei pronun\u021bate de Tribunalul Harghita prin care s-a dispus anularea unei dispozi\u021bii de imputare emis\u0103 cu scopul angaj\u0103rii r\u0103spunderii patrimoniale a unor func\u021bionari publici, din cadrul aparatului de specialitate a Primarului UAT, motivul principal al anul\u0103rii [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[87],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9524","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-contencios-administrativ"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9524","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9524"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9524\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9525,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9524\/revisions\/9525"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9524"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9524"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9524"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}