{"id":9381,"date":"2026-04-06T12:34:40","date_gmt":"2026-04-06T09:34:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/?p=9381"},"modified":"2026-04-06T12:35:48","modified_gmt":"2026-04-06T09:35:48","slug":"inalta-curte-de-casatie-si-justitie-achitare-definitiva-pentru-infractiunea-de-dare-de-mita","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/inalta-curte-de-casatie-si-justitie-achitare-definitiva-pentru-infractiunea-de-dare-de-mita\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie – Achitare definitiv\u0103 pentru infrac\u0163iunea de dare de mit\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"

Solu\u0163ie de achitare definitiv\u0103 \u00eentr-un dosar de corup\u0163ie. \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie a constatat c\u0103 fapta nu exist\u0103 \u015fi a respins apelul Ministerului Public.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Clientul societ\u0103\u0163ii noastre a fost achitat definitiv pentru s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015firea infrac\u0163iunii de dare de mit\u0103, prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 290 C.pen. raportat la art. 6 din Legea nr. 78\/2000, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie constat\u00e2nd inexisten\u0163a faptei.<\/p>\n

Instan\u0163a suprem\u0103 a respins apelul Ministerului Public cu privire la pretinsa netemeinicie a solu\u0163iei de achitare ca nefondat, \u00eentruc\u00e2t ansamblul probator nu este de natur\u0103 a sus\u0163ine, \u00een mod cert \u015fi neechivoc, o solu\u0163ie de condamnare sub aspectul infrac\u0163iunii de dare de mit\u0103.<\/p>\n

\u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie a re\u0163inut faptul c\u0103 solu\u0163ia de achitare dispus\u0103 de c\u0103tre prima instan\u0163\u0103 este legal\u0103 \u015fi temeinic\u0103, neexist\u00e2nd probe care s\u0103 confirme \u00eentrunirea elementelor constitutive ale infrac\u0163iunii de dare de mit\u0103 de care a fost acuzat clientul nostru.<\/p>\n

\u00cen motivarea acestei decizii, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie a re\u0163inut c\u0103:<\/p>\n

\u00cenalta Curte, proced\u00e2nd la o analiz\u0103 exhaustiv\u0103 \u015fi integrat\u0103 a \u00eentregului material probator administrat pe parcursul procesului penal, constat\u0103 c\u0103 solu\u0163iile de achitare pronun\u0163ate de instan\u0163a de fond sunt temeinice \u015fi legale, corespunz\u0103toare realit\u0103\u0163ii \u015fi se impune men\u0163inerea lor, \u00een acord cu dispozi\u0163iile art. 16 alin. (1) lit. a) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103, potrivit c\u0103rora \u201eac\u0163iunea penal\u0103 nu poate fi pus\u0103 \u00een mi\u015fcare, iar c\u00e2nd a fost pus\u0103 \u00een mi\u015fcare nu mai poate fi exercitat\u0103 dac\u0103: fapta nu exist\u0103\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n

Astfel, analiz\u00e2nd \u00een mod unitar \u015fi exhaustiv \u00eentregul material probator administrat \u00een cursul procesului penal, \u00cenalta Curte constat\u0103 c\u0103 nu exist\u0103 probe care s\u0103 confirme \u00eentrunirea concomitent\u0103 a elementelor constitutive, at\u00e2t obiective, c\u00e2t \u015fi subiective, ale infrac\u0163iunilor imputate intima\u0163ilor inculpa\u0163i, respectiv dare de mit\u0103 \u015fi complicitate la dare de mit\u0103.<\/em><\/p>\n

Analiza detaliat\u0103 a declara\u0163iilor date \u00een cauza de fa\u0163\u0103 a relevat c\u0103 \u00eent\u00e2lnirile \u015fi comunic\u0103rile purtate \u00eentre cei doi inculpa\u0163i au avut un caracter exclusiv profesional \u015fi comercial, f\u0103r\u0103 nicio leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu vreun dosar penal, iar eventualele sume de bani transmise nu au fost dovedite ca av\u00e2nd destina\u0163ia unei mite, ci reprezint\u0103 doar obliga\u0163ii contractuale restante, achitate legal prin intermediul procedurilor bancare obi\u015fnuite.<\/em><\/p>\n

A\u015fadar, coroborarea tuturor probelor arat\u0103 c\u0103 nu a fost relevat\u0103 nicio dovad\u0103 privind solicitarea sau remiterea de sume de bani cu titlu de mit\u0103, nici existen\u0163a unei \u00een\u0163elegeri infrac\u0163ionale \u00eentre cei doi inculpa\u0163i, astfel \u00eenc\u00e2t faptele de dare de mit\u0103 \u015fi complicitate la dare de mit\u0103 nu exist\u0103 \u00een materialitatea lor.<\/em><\/p>\n

Clientul nostru a fost asistat de o echip\u0103 de avoca\u0163i ai SCA Chiri\u0163\u0103 \u015fi Asocia\u0163ii format\u0103 din Radu Chiri\u0163\u0103, Bianca Pantea<\/strong> \u015fi Flavia \u0162uic\u0103.<\/strong><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Solu\u0163ie de achitare definitiv\u0103 \u00eentr-un dosar de corup\u0163ie. \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie a constatat c\u0103 fapta nu exist\u0103 \u015fi a respins apelul Ministerului Public. Clientul societ\u0103\u0163ii noastre a fost achitat definitiv pentru s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015firea infrac\u0163iunii de dare de mit\u0103, prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 290 C.pen. raportat la art. 6 din Legea nr. 78\/2000, \u00cenalta Curte […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9381"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9381\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9384,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9381\/revisions\/9384"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}