{"id":900,"date":"2016-11-07T07:48:03","date_gmt":"2016-11-07T07:48:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=900"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:39","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:39","slug":"nemotivarea-hotararii-judecatoresti-desfiintarea-sentintei-cu-trimiterea-cauzei-spre-rejudecare-de-catre-aceeasi-instanta","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/nemotivarea-hotararii-judecatoresti-desfiintarea-sentintei-cu-trimiterea-cauzei-spre-rejudecare-de-catre-aceeasi-instanta\/","title":{"rendered":"Nemotivarea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii judec\u0103tore\u015fti. Desfiin\u0163area sentin\u0163ei cu trimiterea cauzei spre rejudecare de c\u0103tre aceea\u015fi instan\u0163\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Prin Decizia penal\u0103 nr. 1037\/A\/2016, Curtea de Apel Cluj a admis apelurile declarate \u00een cauz\u0103 \u015fi a dispus desfin\u0163area \u00een \u00eentregime a sentin\u0163ei pronun\u0163ate de Tribunalul Cluj \u015fi rejudecarea cauzei de c\u0103tre aceea\u015fi instan\u0163\u0103.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Curtea a re\u0163inut c\u0103 Tribunalul Cluj a respins \u00een bloc toate excep\u0163iile invocate \u00een spe\u0163\u0103 de c\u0103tre avoca\u0163ii inculpa\u0163ilor precum \u015fi toate probele testimoniale \u015fi \u015ftiin\u0163ifice solicitate de ace\u015ftia \u00een ap\u0103rarea apelan\u0163ilor, iar pe de alt\u0103 parte, nic\u0103ieri \u00een cuprinsul hot\u0103r\u00e2rii nu se analizeaz\u0103 ap\u0103r\u0103rile formulate de inculpa\u0163i, neexist\u00e2nd nicio referire la \u00eentrunirea elementelor constitutive ale faptelor deduse judec\u0103\u0163ii \u015fi nici la solicit\u0103rile de achitare a inculpa\u0163ilor \u015fi la modul de solu\u0163ionare a laturii civile a spe\u0163ei, prin prisma cererilor principale \u015fi subsidiare ale acestora, viz\u00e2nd existen\u0163a \u015fi cuantumul prejudiciului cauzat p\u0103r\u0163ilor civile, precum \u015fi a faptului dac\u0103 acestea au sau nu calitate procesual\u0103 activ\u0103 \u00een acest dosar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S-a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 enumerarea mijloacelor de prob\u0103 existente la dosar nu poate suplini motivarea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii \u015fi c\u0103 nici cu privire la ac\u0163iunea civil\u0103 \u015fi ap\u0103r\u0103rile inculpatei C. sub acest aspect, \u00een sentin\u0163a Tribunalului Cluj nu exist\u0103 nicio referire.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Curtea a argumentat c\u0103 referirea global\u0103 sau absen\u0163a oric\u0103rei trimiteri la probele administrate, pe latur\u0103 penal\u0103 sau civil\u0103, f\u0103r\u0103 analiza acestora \u00een raport cu componentele desp\u0103gubirilor la plata c\u0103rora inculpatul este obligat, constituie o nemotivare a hot\u0103r\u00e2rii. Lipsa motiv\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rii sub aspect civil \u015fi penal face imposibil\u0103 exercitarea controlului judiciar a acesteia.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pentru a putea efectua acest control, \u00een apel, este necesar a se cunoa\u015fte care a fost starea de fapt re\u0163inut\u0103 de instan\u0163a a c\u0103rei hot\u0103r\u00e2re este atacat\u0103 \u015fi pe baza c\u0103ror probe s-a ajuns la aceast\u0103 stabilire. Acest lucru nu poate fi verificat dec\u00e2t pe baza motiv\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rii apelate. Sentin\u0163a Tribunalului Cluj nu cuprinde motivele pe care se \u00eentemeiaz\u0103 solu\u0163ia respectiv, au fost l\u0103sate neanalizate probele propuse de fiecare inculpat \u00een parte, ap\u0103r\u0103rile formulate, dac\u0103 acestea au stat sau nu la baza solu\u0163iei de condamnare, magistratul fondului ner\u0103spunz\u00e2nd la niciuna dintre criticile sau probele propuse \u00een ap\u0103rare de c\u0103tre apelan\u0163i.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Or, s-a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 realizarea \u00een apel a \u00eentregii cercet\u0103ri judec\u0103tore\u015fti, ar r\u0103pi inculpa\u0163ilor un grad de jurisdic\u0163ie \u015fi le-ar afecta \u00een mod grav dreptul la ap\u0103rare, c\u00e2t\u0103 vreme ei nu ar mai avea la dispozi\u0163ie nicio cale de atac, decizia Cur\u0163ii fiind definitiv\u0103, iar sentin\u0163a instan\u0163ei de fond este nemotivat\u0103, neput\u00e2ndu-se exercita controlul judiciar.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Curtea a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 de\u015fi este adev\u0103rat c\u0103 ar fi existat posibilitatea ca Tribunalul Cluj s\u0103 doreasc\u0103 solu\u0163ionarea cu celeritate a cauzei, \u00een condi\u0163iile \u00een care procesul era pe rol de mai mul\u0163i ani, celeritatea nu poate afecta unul din drepturile importante ale persoanei, respectiv dreptul la ap\u0103rare.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pentru aceste motive, Curtea a admis apelurile declarate de inculpata C. \u015fi de ceilal\u0163i inculpa\u0163i din cauz\u0103 \u015fi a dispus desfiin\u0163area \u00een \u00eentregime a sentinei Tribunalului Cluj \u015fi rejudecarea cauzei de c\u0103tre prima instan\u0163\u0103.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Inculpata C. a fost asistat\u0103 \u00een cauz\u0103 de o echip\u0103 de avoca\u0163i din cadrul SCA Chiri\u0163\u0103 \u015fi asocia\u0163ii.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Prin Decizia penal\u0103 nr. 1037\/A\/2016, Curtea de Apel Cluj a admis apelurile declarate \u00een cauz\u0103 \u015fi a dispus desfin\u0163area \u00een \u00eentregime a sentin\u0163ei pronun\u0163ate de Tribunalul Cluj \u015fi rejudecarea cauzei de c\u0103tre aceea\u015fi instan\u0163\u0103. Curtea a re\u0163inut c\u0103 Tribunalul Cluj a respins \u00een bloc toate excep\u0163iile invocate \u00een spe\u0163\u0103 de c\u0103tre avoca\u0163ii inculpa\u0163ilor precum \u015fi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-900","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drept-penal","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/900","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=900"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/900\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=900"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}