{"id":5075,"date":"2023-09-01T09:25:23","date_gmt":"2023-09-01T09:25:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=5075"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:30","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:30","slug":"dreptul-la-respectarea-vietii-private-incidenta-in-timpul-exercitarii-atributiilor-de-serviciu-cedo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/dreptul-la-respectarea-vietii-private-incidenta-in-timpul-exercitarii-atributiilor-de-serviciu-cedo\/","title":{"rendered":"Dreptul la respectarea vie\u0163ii private. Inciden\u0163a acestuia \u00een timpul exercit\u0103rii atribu\u0163iilor de serviciu. Ne\u00eenc\u0103lcarea dreptului"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dreptul la respectarea vie\u0163ii private \u015fi inciden\u0163a acestuia \u00een timpul exercit\u0103rii atribu\u0163iilor de serviciu a f\u0103cut obiectul analizei <a href=\"https:\/\/www.echr.coe.int\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cur\u0163ii Europene a Drepturilor Omului<\/a> (\u00een continuare C.E.D.O. sau Curtea) \u00eentr-o cauz\u0103 \u00eendreptat\u0103 \u00eempotriva Rom\u00e2niei. \u00cen acest context, Curtea a decis c\u0103 dreptul la respectarea vie\u0163ii private a reclamantului nu a fost \u00eenc\u0103lcat prin utilizarea \u00eentr-un dosar penal a unor \u00eenregistr\u0103ri efectuate de c\u0103tre un alt inculpat, cu o camer\u0103 video miniatural\u0103, ata\u015fat\u0103 la un stilou, f\u0103r\u0103 \u015ftirea reclamantului.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Starea de fapt.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00cen cauza <a href=\"https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-223702\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">S\u00e2rbu c. Rom\u00e2niei<\/a>, reclamantul s-a pl\u00e2ns de \u00eenc\u0103lcarea dreptului s\u0103u la via\u0163\u0103 privat\u0103, prev\u0103zut de art. 8 din <a href=\"https:\/\/www.echr.coe.int\/documents\/d\/echr\/convention_ron\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Conven\u0163ie<\/a>, prin faptul c\u0103 \u00een dosarul penal \u00een care a fost condamnat definitiv pentru <a href=\"https:\/\/legeaz.net\/noul-cod-penal\/art-289\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">luare de mit\u0103<\/a>, printre probele folosite s-au reg\u0103sit \u00eenregistr\u0103ri video efectuate de c\u0103tre persoana de la care ar fi luat mita, inculpat \u00een acela\u015fi dosar. Conform acuza\u0163iei, mita a fost luat\u0103 \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu \u00a0efectuarea unui control la o societate, de la administratorul societ\u0103\u0163ii, care a \u00eenregistrat conversa\u0163iile incriminatoare, f\u0103r\u0103 \u015ftirea celorlal\u0163i participan\u0163i.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cenregistr\u0103rile au fost descoperite cu ocazia unei perchezi\u0163ii informatice efectuate \u00eentr-o alt\u0103 cauz\u0103 penal\u0103 care \u00eel viza pe reclamant \u015fi au fost ad\u0103ugate la dosarul \u00een cauz\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Pentru clarificarea situa\u0163iei \u00eenregistr\u0103rilor s-a efectuat o expertiz\u0103 prin care s-a stabilit faptul c\u0103 vocea \u015fi imaginea surprinse apar\u0163ineau reclamantului. Aceste elemente reprezint\u0103 date cu caracter personal.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Protec\u0163ia dreptului la via\u0163\u0103 privat\u0103 \u00een timpul exercit\u0103rii atribu\u0163iilor de serviciu.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.ro\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Guvernul<\/a> a invocat faptul c\u0103 \u00een situa\u0163ia analizat\u0103 nu ar fi aplicabil dreptul la respectarea vie\u0163ii private deoarece \u00eenregistr\u0103rile video \u00eel surprindeau pe reclamant \u00een timpul serviciului, \u00een cursul exercit\u0103rii atribu\u0163iilor sale profesionale. \u00cenregistr\u0103rile con\u0163ineau conversa\u0163ii la care a participat reclamantul cu ocazia efectu\u0103rii unui control ce intra \u00een atribu\u0163iile sale de serviciu, la sediul unei societ\u0103\u0163i comerciale.<\/p>\n<p>Curtea a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 no\u0163iunea de \u201evia\u0163\u0103 privat\u0103\u201d nu se interpreteaz\u0103 \u00eentr-un sens restrictiv, ci aceasta poate acoperi \u015fi activit\u0103\u0163ile desf\u0103\u015furate \u00een timpul serviciului sau activit\u0103\u0163i desf\u0103\u015furate \u00eentr-un context public. De asemenea, a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 via\u0163a privat\u0103 a unei persoane poate fi afectat\u0103 de m\u0103suri luate \u00een afara domiciliului sau a spa\u0163iilor private.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cenregistr\u0103rile video efectuate la locul de munc\u0103 sau \u00een timpul exercit\u0103rii atribu\u0163iilor de serviciu pot conduce la \u00eenc\u0103lcarea dreptului la respectarea vie\u0163ii private a unei persoane \u00een cazul \u00een care, de exemplu, datele ob\u0163inute sunt utilizate \u00een cadrul unor proceduri judiciare sau sunt p\u0103strate pentru o perioad\u0103 de timp lung\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Curtea a analizat inciden\u0163a dreptului la respectarea vie\u0163ii private cu ocazia exercit\u0103rii atribu\u0163iilor de serviciu \u015fi \u00eentr-o alt\u0103 pl\u00e2ngere \u00eempotriva Rom\u00e2niei, respectiv \u00een <a href=\"https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-177333\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">cauza B\u0103rbulescu c. Rom\u00e2niei<\/a>, f\u0103c\u00e2nd trimiterea la cele re\u0163inute \u015fi \u00een acea spe\u0163\u0103.<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Analiza situa\u0163iei reclamantului.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Curtea a constatat c\u0103 \u00eenregistr\u0103rile au fost efectuate de c\u0103tre administratorul societ\u0103\u0163ii, care a luat parte la conversa\u0163ii, a avut calitatea de inculpat \u015fi a recunoscut s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015firea faptei de <a href=\"https:\/\/legeaz.net\/noul-cod-penal\/art-290\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">dare de mit\u0103<\/a>. Legea permite folosirea \u00eenregistr\u0103rilor efectuate de c\u0103tre o persoan\u0103 fizic\u0103, f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 fie necesar\u0103 autorizarea \u00eenregistr\u0103rii de c\u0103tre un judec\u0103tor.<\/p>\n<p>Analiza Cur\u0163ii a vizat, printre altele, \u015fi scopul \u00een care au fost utilizate \u00eenregistr\u0103rile, astfel s-a re\u0163inut c\u0103 acestea au fost utilizate \u00een cadrul unei proceduri penale ce se derula cu privire la fapte de corup\u0163ie, \u015fi viza doi inculpa\u0163i, unul dintre ei fiind reclamantul, care de\u0163ineau func\u0163ii publice \u015fi aveau printre atribu\u0163iile de serviciu verificarea sumelor datorate statului de c\u0103tre societ\u0103\u0163ile comerciale cu titlu de obliga\u0163ii fiscale.<\/p>\n<p>De asemenea, \u00eenregistr\u0103rile vizau dou\u0103 incidente punctuale, f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 fie ob\u0163inute pe parcursul unei supravegheri constante sau prelungite pentru o perioad\u0103 lung\u0103 de timp.<\/p>\n<p>Curtea a analizat pl\u00e2ngerea prin raportare la aspectele concrete ale spe\u0163ei \u015fi drepturile garantate de c\u0103tre Conven\u0163ie \u015fi a constatat c\u0103 \u00een cazul reclamantului, de\u015fi este incident dreptul la respectarea vie\u0163ii private, acesta nu a fost \u00eenc\u0103lcat.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>avocat Leila Bartha<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dreptul la respectarea vie\u0163ii private \u015fi inciden\u0163a acestuia \u00een timpul exercit\u0103rii atribu\u0163iilor de serviciu a f\u0103cut obiectul analizei Cur\u0163ii Europene a Drepturilor Omului (\u00een continuare C.E.D.O. sau Curtea) \u00eentr-o cauz\u0103 \u00eendreptat\u0103 \u00eempotriva Rom\u00e2niei. \u00cen acest context, Curtea a decis c\u0103 dreptul la respectarea vie\u0163ii private a reclamantului nu a fost \u00eenc\u0103lcat prin utilizarea \u00eentr-un dosar [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[83,11,84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5075","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reprezentare-in-fata-cedo","category-drept-penal","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5075","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5075"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5075\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5075"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5075"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5075"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}