{"id":5054,"date":"2023-04-27T13:37:46","date_gmt":"2023-04-27T13:37:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=5054"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:31","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:31","slug":"trimiterea-cauzei-spre-rejudecare-constatarea-incalcarii-dreptului-la-informare-cu-privire-la-acuzatie-solutie-definitiva","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/trimiterea-cauzei-spre-rejudecare-constatarea-incalcarii-dreptului-la-informare-cu-privire-la-acuzatie-solutie-definitiva\/","title":{"rendered":"Trimiterea cauzei spre rejudecare. Constatarea \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii dreptului la informare cu privire la acuza\u0163ie. Solu\u0163ie definitiv\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u00centr-o cauz\u0103 \u00een care au fost formulate acuza\u0163ii privind comiterea unor fapte de corup\u0163ie, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iccj.ro\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie<\/a> a dispus trimiterea cauzei spre rejudecare la instan\u0163a de fond. Solu\u0163ia a fost dispus\u0103 c\u0103 urmare a constat\u0103rii \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii dreptului la informare \u00een ceea ce prive\u015fte acuza\u0163ia, a nemotiv\u0103rii \u00eencheierii de schimbare a \u00eencadr\u0103rii juridice \u015fi implicit a lipsei unui grad de jurisdic\u0163ie.<\/p>\n<p>Anterior, clientul societ\u0103\u0163ii noastre a fost condamnat \u00een prim\u0103 instan\u0163\u0103 de <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cab1864.eu\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Curtea de Apel Bucure\u015fti<\/a> la pedeapsa \u00eenchisorii cu executare \u00een regim de deten\u0163ie pentru s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015firea unei infrac\u0163iuni de cump\u0103rare de influen\u0163\u0103. Printr-o \u00eencheiere a primei instan\u0163e, aceasta a schimbat \u00eencadrarea juridic\u0103 a faptei imputate clientului nostru din infrac\u0163iunea de <a href=\"https:\/\/lege5.ro\/gratuit\/gezdmnrzgi\/darea-de-mita-codul-penal?dp=gqytsojvgm4dq\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">dare de mit\u0103<\/a> pentru care a fost trimis \u00een judecat\u0103, \u00een infrac\u0163iunea de <a href=\"https:\/\/legeaz.net\/noul-cod-penal\/art-292\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">cump\u0103rare de influen\u0163\u0103<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Instan\u0163a suprem\u0103 a admis apelul formulat de clientul nostru, a desfiin\u0163at \u00een totalitate sentin\u0163a penal\u0103 apelat\u0103 \u015fi \u00eencheierea de schimbare a \u00eencadr\u0103rii juridice \u015fi a trimis cauza spre rejudecare la instan\u0163a de fond.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen motivarea acestei decizii, instan\u0163a suprem\u0103 a re\u0163inut c\u0103: \u201e<em>Astfel cum se observ\u0103, \u00een raport cu faptele re\u0163inute \u00een procesul verbal de aducere la cuno\u015ftin\u0163\u0103 a acuza\u0163iei, urmare a punerii \u00een mi\u015fcare a ac\u0163iunii penale \u015fi dob\u00e2ndirii calit\u0103\u0163ii de inculpat, detaliile \u00eenvinuirilor sunt modificate, astfel c\u0103 acestea trebuiau comunicate inculpa\u0163ilor cu promptitudinea prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 6 paragraful 3 lit. a) din Conven\u0163ie, respectiv chiar prin \u00eencheierea de schimbare a \u00eencadr\u0103rii juridice. Instan\u0163a de fond era obligat\u0103 s\u0103 procedeze \u00een acest mod, fiind total nerelevant\u0103 motivarea acesteia \u00een sensul c\u0103 faptele s-ar reg\u0103si descrise \u00een rechizitoriu, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere, pe de o parte, limitele actului de sesizare, astfel cum sunt acestea men\u0163ionate \u00een dispozi\u0163iile art. 328 alin. (1) C. proc. pen. (faptele pentru care s-a efectuat urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103) \u015fi, pe de alt\u0103 parte, con\u0163inutul concret al acuza\u0163iilor ce le-au fost aduse la cuno\u015ftin\u0163\u0103 inculpa\u0163ilor conform proceselor verbale anterior expuse.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00cen aceste circumstan\u0163e, \u00cenalta Curte constat\u0103 criticile inculpa\u0163ilor \u00eentemeiate, omisiunea instan\u0163ei de fond de a-i \u00eencuno\u015ftiin\u0163a, odat\u0103 cu dispozi\u0163ia de schimbare a \u00eencadr\u0103rii juridice, fie \u015fi printr-o motivare succint\u0103, despre con\u0163inutul concret al acuza\u0163iei constituie o \u00eenc\u0103lcare grav\u0103 a prevederilor art. 6 paragraful 3 lit. a) din Conven\u0163ie, apelan\u0163ii fiind pu\u015fi \u00een situa\u0163ia de a afla faptele re\u0163inute \u00een sarcina lor odat\u0103 cu pronun\u0163area sen\u0163in\u0163ei de condamnare. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere desfiin\u0163area, pentru motive de nulitate absolut\u0103 a hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor din primul ciclu procesual, \u00cenalta Curte nu poate aprecia c\u0103 dreptul inculpa\u0163ilor ar fi fost respectat prin raportare la aceste din urm\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2ri, care, oricum sunt \u015fi anterioare deciziei Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale nr. 250 din 16 aprilie 2019, \u00een care s-a statuat asupra importan\u0163ei comunic\u0103rii cu promtitudine a oric\u0103rei modific\u0103ri care vizeaz\u0103 \u00eenvinuirea adus\u0103. Constatarea \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii dreptului la informare \u015fi comunicarea faptelor chiar prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea de condamnare conduce la desfiin\u0163area at\u00e2t a sentin\u0163ei c\u00e2t \u015fi a \u00eencheierii de schimbare a \u00eencadr\u0103rii juridice \u015fi trimiterea cauzei spre rejudecare, inculpa\u0163ii fiind lipsi\u0163i de un grad de jurisdic\u0163iei&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Clientul nostru a fost asistat de o echip\u0103 de avoca\u0163i ai SCA Chiri\u0163\u0103 \u015fi Asocia\u0163ii format\u0103 din Radu Chiri\u0163\u0103, Bianca Pantea \u015fi Flavia \u0162uic\u0103.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00centr-o cauz\u0103 \u00een care au fost formulate acuza\u0163ii privind comiterea unor fapte de corup\u0163ie, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie a dispus trimiterea cauzei spre rejudecare la instan\u0163a de fond. Solu\u0163ia a fost dispus\u0103 c\u0103 urmare a constat\u0103rii \u00eenc\u0103lc\u0103rii dreptului la informare \u00een ceea ce prive\u015fte acuza\u0163ia, a nemotiv\u0103rii \u00eencheierii de schimbare a \u00eencadr\u0103rii juridice [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[83,11,84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5054","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reprezentare-in-fata-cedo","category-drept-penal","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5054","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5054"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5054\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5054"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5054"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}