{"id":4967,"date":"2022-12-19T13:26:02","date_gmt":"2022-12-19T13:26:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=4967"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:31","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:31","slug":"cerere-de-revizuire-admiterea-cererii-fond-incetarea-procesului-prescriptie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/cerere-de-revizuire-admiterea-cererii-fond-incetarea-procesului-prescriptie\/","title":{"rendered":"Cerere de revizuire. Admiterea cererii pe fond. \u00cencetarea procesului penal ca urmare a interven\u0163iei prescrip\u0163iei"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/tribunalulbucuresti.ro\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tribunalul Bucure\u015fti<\/a> a solu\u0163ionat o cerere de revizuire \u015fi a dispus admiterea cererii \u00een fond. Subsecvent, instan\u0163a a dispus \u00eencetarea procesului penal ca urmare a interven\u0163iei prescrip\u0163iei r\u0103spunderii penale.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen esen\u0163\u0103, \u00een cursul anului 2020, clientul nostru a fost condamnat definitiv la pedeapsa \u00eenchisorii pentru pretinse fapte de corup\u0163ie care ar fi fost comise spre finalul anului 2008.<\/p>\n<p>Av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 \u00een timpul procesului a fost pronun\u0163at\u0103 \u015fi a \u00eenceput s\u0103 produc\u0103 efecte juridice <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ccr.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Decizie_297_2018.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Decizia nr. 297\/2018 a Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale<\/a>, privind dispozi\u0163iile <a href=\"https:\/\/legislatie.just.ro\/Public\/DetaliiDocumentAfis\/223635\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">art. 155 alin. (1) C. pen.<\/a>, referitoare la \u00eentreruperea cursului prescrip\u0163iei, \u00een cursul judec\u0103rii cauzei \u00een apel am solicitat \u00eencetarea procesului penal ca urmare a interven\u0163iei prescrip\u0163iei, consider\u00e2nd c\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea instan\u0163ei de contencios constitu\u0163ional este o decizie simpl\u0103, care a avut ca efect \u00eencetarea oric\u0103ror efecte juridice a sintagmei sanc\u0163ionate de Curte. Totodat\u0103, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 \u00een acel moment practica juridic\u0103 tindea s\u0103 considere Decizia nr. 297\/2018 a Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale ca fiind o decizie interpretativ\u0103, am formulat o excep\u0163ie de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate a prevederilor art. 155 alin. (1) C. pen. \u00een configura\u0163ia pe care aceast\u0103 norm\u0103 o avea ulterior Deciziei nr. 297\/2018 a Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen cursul anului 2022, instan\u0163a de contencios constitu\u0163ional a validat argumentele invocate \u00een cuprinsul excep\u0163iei de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate \u015fi a pronun\u0163at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ccr.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Decizie_358_2022.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Decizia nr. 358\/2022 a Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale<\/a>, ceea ce a deschis calea introducerii unei cereri de revizuire \u00een interesul clientului nostru.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen cadrul revizuirii, ulterior <a href=\"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/revizuire-admisa-in-principiu-in-baza-deciziilor-curtii-constitutionale-privind-intreruperea-prescriptiei-raspunderii-penale-suspendarea-executarii-hotararii-de-condamnare\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">admiterii \u00een principiu a cererii de revizuire la care am f\u0103cut referire \u00eentr-un material anterior<\/a>, Tribunalul Bucure\u015fti a dispus admiterea pe fond a cererii de revizuire, anularea hot\u0103r\u00e2rii de condamnare, iar \u00een rejudecare a dispus \u00eencetarea procesului penal, constat\u00e2nd faptul c\u0103 prescrip\u0163ia r\u0103spunderii penale se \u00eemplinise \u00eenc\u0103 de la finalul anului 2016, la doar c\u00e2teva zile dup\u0103 ce \u00een cauz\u0103 abia se dispunea \u00eenceperea urm\u0103ririi penale <em>in personam.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Clientul nostru a fost asistat de o echip\u0103 de avoca\u0163i ai SCA Chiri\u0163\u0103 \u015fi Asocia\u0163ii format\u0103 din Radu Chiri\u0163\u0103 \u015fi \u015etefan Alexandru.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tribunalul Bucure\u015fti a solu\u0163ionat o cerere de revizuire \u015fi a dispus admiterea cererii \u00een fond. Subsecvent, instan\u0163a a dispus \u00eencetarea procesului penal ca urmare a interven\u0163iei prescrip\u0163iei r\u0103spunderii penale. \u00cen esen\u0163\u0103, \u00een cursul anului 2020, clientul nostru a fost condamnat definitiv la pedeapsa \u00eenchisorii pentru pretinse fapte de corup\u0163ie care ar fi fost comise spre [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4967","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drept-penal","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4967","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4967"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4967\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}