{"id":4954,"date":"2022-11-23T14:30:20","date_gmt":"2022-11-23T14:30:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=4954"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:31","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:31","slug":"cerere-de-sesizare-curtii-de-justitie-uniunii-europene-cu-intrebari-preliminare-pe-tema-prescriptiei","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/cerere-de-sesizare-curtii-de-justitie-uniunii-europene-cu-intrebari-preliminare-pe-tema-prescriptiei\/","title":{"rendered":"Cerere de sesizare a Cur\u0163ii de Justi\u0163ie a Uniunii Europene cu \u00eentreb\u0103ri preliminare pe tema prescrip\u0163iei r\u0103spunderii penale. Respingere ca inadmisibil\u0103."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u00centr-o cauz\u0103 \u00een care societatea noastr\u0103 asigur\u0103 asisten\u0163a juridic\u0103, parchetul a formulat o cerere de sesizare a <a href=\"http:\/\/curia.europa.eu\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cur\u0163ii de Justi\u0163ie a Uniunii Europene<\/a> cu \u00eentreb\u0103ri preliminare pe tema prescrip\u0163iei r\u0103spunderii penale. Cererea parchetului a fost respins\u0103 ca inadmisibil\u0103 printr-o \u00eencheiere recent\u0103 a <a href=\"https:\/\/tribunalulbucuresti.ro\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tribunalului Bucure\u015fti<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\u00cen esen\u0163\u0103, parchetul a solicitat sesizarea Cur\u0163ii de Justi\u0163ie a Uniunii Europene cu \u00eentreb\u0103ri preliminare pe tema prescrip\u0163iei r\u0103spunderii penale, \u00eentreb\u0103ri prin care se tindea la invalidarea efectelor <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ccr.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Decizie_297_2018.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Deciziei nr. 297\/2018 a Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale<\/a> \u015fi a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ccr.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Decizie_358_2022.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Deciziei nr. 358\/2022 a Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale<\/a>, iar nu la interpretarea tratatelor sau la verificarea validitat\u0103\u0163ii \u015fi interpretarea actelor adoptate de institu\u0163iile, organele, oficiile sau agen\u0163iile Uniunii, astfel cum impun prevederile art. 267 din <a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/resource.html?uri=cellar:2bf140bf-a3f8-4ab2-b506-fd71826e6da6.0001.02\/DOC_2&amp;format=PDF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tratatul privind Func\u0163ionarea Uniunii Europene<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Tribunalul Bucure\u015fti a considerat c\u0103 interven\u0163ia instan\u0163ei europene nu este util\u0103. Mai mult, instan\u0163a a remarcat c\u0103 \u201e<em>cererea formulata de parchet nu este o veritabila cerere de sesizare a CJUE, urm\u0103rind solu\u0163ionarea pe fond a cauzei\u201d <\/em>\u015fi a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 <em>cererea formulata de o parte\/participant, prin care se tinde \u00een realitate s\u0103 se ob\u0163in\u0103 din partea Cur\u0163ii de Justi\u0163ie a Uniunii Europene o \u201edecizie de \u00eendrumare\u201d \u00een solu\u0163ionarea \u00een concret a cauzei de c\u0103tre instan\u0163a na\u0163ional\u0103, este inadmisibil\u0103, \u00een aceast\u0103 situa\u0163ie nefiind \u00eendeplinite condi\u0163iile prev\u0103zute de art. 267 din Tratatul privind Func\u0163ionarea Uniunii Europene<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Ap\u0103rarea clientul a fost asigurat\u0103 de o echip\u0103 de avoca\u0163i din cadrul SCA Chiri\u0163\u0103 \u015fi Asocia\u0163ii, format\u0103 din \u015etefan Alexandru \u015fi Florina Suciu.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00centr-o cauz\u0103 \u00een care societatea noastr\u0103 asigur\u0103 asisten\u0163a juridic\u0103, parchetul a formulat o cerere de sesizare a Cur\u0163ii de Justi\u0163ie a Uniunii Europene cu \u00eentreb\u0103ri preliminare pe tema prescrip\u0163iei r\u0103spunderii penale. Cererea parchetului a fost respins\u0103 ca inadmisibil\u0103 printr-o \u00eencheiere recent\u0103 a Tribunalului Bucure\u015fti. \u00cen esen\u0163\u0103, parchetul a solicitat sesizarea Cur\u0163ii de Justi\u0163ie a Uniunii [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,85,84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4954","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drept-penal","category-dreptul-uniunii-europene-reprezentare-in-fata-cjue","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4954","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4954"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4954\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4954"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4954"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4954"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}