{"id":4946,"date":"2022-11-17T12:22:20","date_gmt":"2022-11-17T12:22:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=4946"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:31","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:31","slug":"curtea-de-apel-bucuresti-respingerea-ca-inadmisibila-unei-contestatii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/curtea-de-apel-bucuresti-respingerea-ca-inadmisibila-unei-contestatii\/","title":{"rendered":"Curtea de Apel Bucure\u015fti. Respingerea ca inadmisibil\u0103 a unei contesta\u0163ii formulate de Direc\u0163ia Na\u0163ional\u0103 Anticorup\u0163ie"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cab1864.eu\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Curtea de Apel Bucure\u015fti<\/a> a respins ca inadmisibil\u0103 o contesta\u0163ie formulat\u0103 fa\u0163\u0103 de o \u00eencheiere a <a href=\"https:\/\/tribunalulbucuresti.ro\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tribunalului Bucure\u015fti<\/a> prin care a fost admis\u0103 o cerere de \u00eencuviin\u0163are prealabil\u0103 a dep\u0103\u015firii limitei teritoriale impuse \u00een procedura de suspendare a execut\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rii supuse revizuirii.<\/p>\n<p>Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea Cur\u0163ii de Apel Bucure\u015fti a fost pronun\u0163at\u0103 \u00een data de 16.11.2022, iar \u00een momentul redact\u0103rii prezentului material \u00eenc\u0103 nu a fost motivat\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Cu toate acestea, putem anticipa c\u0103 instan\u0163a a avut \u00een vedere c\u0103 potrivit <a href=\"https:\/\/legislatie.just.ro\/Public\/DetaliiDocument\/120611\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">art. 425<sup>1<\/sup> alin. (1) C. proc. pen.<\/a>, <em>calea de atac a contesta\u0163iei se poate exercita numai atunci c\u00e2nd legea o prevede expres<\/em>. Or, \u00een cadrul revizuirii, legea de procedur\u0103 permite exercitarea c\u0103ii de atac a contesta\u0163iei doar cu privire la \u00eencheierile prin care se dispune suspendarea execut\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rii suspuse revizuirii. \u00cencheierea de \u00eencuviin\u0163are prealabil\u0103 a dep\u0103\u015firii limitei teritoriale nu poate fi confundat\u0103 cu \u00eencheierea de dispunere a suspend\u0103rii execut\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rii, obiectul \u015fi consecin\u0163ele celor dou\u0103 dispozi\u0163ii fiind complet diferite.<\/p>\n<p>Din punct de vedere juridic, m\u0103surile de supraveghere dispuse cu ocazia suspend\u0103rii execut\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rii supuse revizuirii nu reprezint\u0103 un veritabil control judiciar. Dispozi\u0163iile legale care guverneaz\u0103 suspendarea execut\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rii supuse revizuirii fac trimitere la cele care guverneaz\u0103 controlul judiciar doar \u00een privin\u0163a con\u0163inutului concret al m\u0103surilor de supraveghere, nu \u015fi \u00een privin\u0163a c\u0103ilor de atac care ar putea fi exercitate.<\/p>\n<p>At\u00e2t timp c\u00e2t legea de procedur\u0103 este de strict\u0103 interpretare, la fel cum este \u015fi regimul c\u0103ilor de atac, contesta\u0163ia <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pna.ro\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Direc\u0163iei Na\u0163ionale Anticorup\u0163ie<\/a> a fost respins\u0103 ca inadmisibil\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>Persoana vizat\u0103 de \u00eencheierea fa\u0163\u0103 de care s-a exercitat calea de atac a contesta\u0163iei a beneficiat de asisten\u0163a juridic\u0103 a unei echipe de avoca\u0163i din cadrul SCA Chiri\u0163\u0103 \u015fi Asocia\u0163ii, coordonate de <a href=\"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/team\/stefan-alexandru\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">avocat \u015etefan Alexandru<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Curtea de Apel Bucure\u015fti a respins ca inadmisibil\u0103 o contesta\u0163ie formulat\u0103 fa\u0163\u0103 de o \u00eencheiere a Tribunalului Bucure\u015fti prin care a fost admis\u0103 o cerere de \u00eencuviin\u0163are prealabil\u0103 a dep\u0103\u015firii limitei teritoriale impuse \u00een procedura de suspendare a execut\u0103rii hot\u0103r\u00e2rii supuse revizuirii. Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea Cur\u0163ii de Apel Bucure\u015fti a fost pronun\u0163at\u0103 \u00een data de 16.11.2022, iar [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4946","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drept-penal","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4946","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4946"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4946\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4946"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4946"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4946"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}