{"id":4932,"date":"2022-11-16T08:12:06","date_gmt":"2022-11-16T08:12:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=4932"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:31","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:31","slug":"cedo-poienaru-c-romaniei-incalcarea-libertatii-de-exprimare-avertizorului-de-integritate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/cedo-poienaru-c-romaniei-incalcarea-libertatii-de-exprimare-avertizorului-de-integritate\/","title":{"rendered":"CEDO. Poienaru c. Rom\u00e2niei. \u00cenc\u0103lcarea libert\u0103\u0163ii de exprimare a avertizorului de integritate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.echr.coe.int\/Pages\/home.aspx?p=home\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CEDO<\/a> a pronun\u0163at \u00een data de 15.11.2022 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea \u00een cauza Poienaru c. Rom\u00e2niei. Prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea pronun\u0163at\u0103, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.echr.coe.int\/Pages\/home.aspx?p=home\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Curtea European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului<\/a> a condamnat din nou Rom\u00e2nia pentru \u00eenc\u0103lcarea libert\u0103\u0163ii de exprimare prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 10 din <a href=\"https:\/\/www.echr.coe.int\/documents\/convention_ron.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Conven\u0163ie<\/a> \u00een ceea ce prive\u015fte un avertizor de integritate.<\/p>\n<p>Reclamantul din cauz\u0103 a fost func\u0163ionar public \u00een cadrul <a href=\"https:\/\/apia.org.ro\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Agen\u0163iei de Pl\u0103\u0163i \u015fi Interven\u0163ie pentru Agricultur\u0103<\/a>. Acesta a fost destituit din func\u0163ie pentru prejudicierea imaginii institu\u0163iei \u015fi a directorului acesteia ca urmare a public\u0103rii unor articole pe blogul propriu prin care reclama comiterea unor nereguli \u00een activitatea institu\u0163iei.<\/p>\n<p>CEDO a constat c\u0103 instan\u0163ele na\u0163ionale sesizate de reclamant nu au analizat \u00een ce m\u0103sur\u0103 acesta poate beneficia de protec\u0163ia legal\u0103 a avertizorilor de integritate. Curtea a re\u0163inut c\u0103 neregulile invocate de reclamant erau unele de interes public care vizau recrutarea func\u0163ionarilor din cadrul APIA \u015fi gestionarea fondurilor publice, nereguli pe care reclamantul le sesizase anterior superiorilor f\u0103r\u0103 a primi r\u0103spuns. \u00cen plus, instan\u0163a european\u0103 a considerat c\u0103 instan\u0163ele na\u0163ionale nu au analizat dac\u0103 afirma\u0163iile reclamantului au fost unele de fapt sau judec\u0103\u0163i de valoare \u015fi c\u0103 nu s-a stabilit care era prejudiciul suferit de directorul institu\u0163iei. \u00a0\u00cen fine, Curtea a considerat c\u0103 statul nu a asigurat un just echilibru \u00eentre interesele aflate \u00een balan\u0163\u0103 prin aplicarea celei mai severe sanc\u0163iuni reclamantului.<\/p>\n<p>Reclamantul a fost asistat \u00een cursul procedurii \u00een fa\u0163a CEDO de o echip\u0103 din cadrul SCA Chiri\u0163\u0103 \u015fi asocia\u0163ii format\u0103 din Radu Chiri\u0163\u0103 \u015fi Bianca Pantea. <a href=\"https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-220786\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea este disponibil\u0103 \u00een limba francez\u0103 aici<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CEDO a pronun\u0163at \u00een data de 15.11.2022 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea \u00een cauza Poienaru c. Rom\u00e2niei. Prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea pronun\u0163at\u0103, Curtea European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului a condamnat din nou Rom\u00e2nia pentru \u00eenc\u0103lcarea libert\u0103\u0163ii de exprimare prev\u0103zut\u0103 de art. 10 din Conven\u0163ie \u00een ceea ce prive\u015fte un avertizor de integritate. Reclamantul din cauz\u0103 a fost func\u0163ionar public \u00een cadrul Agen\u0163iei [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[83],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4932","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reprezentare-in-fata-cedo"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4932","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4932"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4932\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4932"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4932"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4932"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}