{"id":4846,"date":"2022-08-30T12:12:18","date_gmt":"2022-08-30T12:12:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=4846"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:32","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:32","slug":"cedo-gal-c-romaniei-incalcarea-dreptului-la-un-proces-echitabil-neaudierea-denuntatorului-in-fata-instantei-si-refuzul-readministrarii-in-apel-a-probelor-relevante-pentru-aparare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/cedo-gal-c-romaniei-incalcarea-dreptului-la-un-proces-echitabil-neaudierea-denuntatorului-in-fata-instantei-si-refuzul-readministrarii-in-apel-a-probelor-relevante-pentru-aparare\/","title":{"rendered":"CEDO. Gal c. Rom\u00e2niei. \u00cenc\u0103lcarea dreptului la un proces echitabil. Neaudierea denun\u0163\u0103torului \u00een fa\u0163a instan\u0163ei \u015fi refuzul readministr\u0103rii \u00een apel a probelor relevante pentru ap\u0103rare."},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.echr.coe.int\/Pages\/home.aspx?p=home\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CEDO<\/a> a constatat \u00eenc\u0103lcarea articolului 6 paragraful 1 \u015fi 3 lit. d) din Conven\u0163ia European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului prin <a href=\"https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-218923\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">hot\u0103r\u00e2rea din 30.08.2022 \u00een cauza Gal c. Rom\u00e2niei (pl\u00e2ngerea nr. 49229\/15)<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Reclamanta fusese trimis\u0103 \u00een judecat\u0103 pentru s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015firea infrac\u0163iunii de complicitate la trafic de influen\u0163\u0103, fiind achitat\u0103 \u00een prim\u0103 instan\u0163\u0103 ca urmare a constat\u0103rii existen\u0163ei unei provoc\u0103ri la s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015firea infrac\u0163iunii. Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea a fost desfiin\u0163at\u0103 \u00een apelul parchetului, instan\u0163a dispun\u00e2nd condamnarea reclamantei baz\u00e2ndu-se \u00een mod determinant pe declara\u0163iile denun\u0163\u0103torilor din dosar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">CEDO a re\u0163inut c\u0103 instan\u0163ele interne nu au luat suficiente m\u0103suri pentru a asigura audierea \u00een fa\u0163a instan\u0163ei \u015fi \u00een condi\u0163ii de contradictorialitate a unuia dintre denun\u0163\u0103tori, care se mutase \u00een Irlanda. Totodat\u0103, Curtea a re\u0163inut c\u0103 instan\u0163a de apel a \u00eenc\u0103lcat dreptul la un proces echitabil al reclamantei prin faptul c\u0103 a respins cererea acesteia de reaudiere a doi martori \u015fi de ascultare \u00een \u015fedin\u0163\u0103 public\u0103 a \u00eenregistr\u0103rilor realizate de ace\u015fti doi martori, probe care sus\u0163ineau teza ap\u0103r\u0103rii privind existen\u0163a provoc\u0103rii la comiterea infrac\u0163iunii \u015fi care au fundamentat solu\u0163ia de achitare din prim\u0103 instan\u0163\u0103. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Asistarea reclamantei \u00een procedura \u00een fa\u0163a Cur\u0163ii Europene a Drepturilor Omului a fost realizat\u0103 de avoca\u0163ii Radu Chiri\u0163\u0103, Bianca Pantea \u015fi Mihnea Novac.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CEDO a constatat \u00eenc\u0103lcarea articolului 6 paragraful 1 \u015fi 3 lit. d) din Conven\u0163ia European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea din 30.08.2022 \u00een cauza Gal c. Rom\u00e2niei (pl\u00e2ngerea nr. 49229\/15). Reclamanta fusese trimis\u0103 \u00een judecat\u0103 pentru s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015firea infrac\u0163iunii de complicitate la trafic de influen\u0163\u0103, fiind achitat\u0103 \u00een prim\u0103 instan\u0163\u0103 ca urmare a constat\u0103rii existen\u0163ei unei [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[83,11,84],"tags":[630,529,631,632,530,564,633,634],"class_list":["post-4846","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reprezentare-in-fata-cedo","category-drept-penal","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice","tag-art-6-cedo","tag-cedo","tag-cedolf","tag-conventia-europeana-a-drepturilor-omului","tag-curtea-europeana-a-drepturilor-omului","tag-dreptul-la-un-proces-echitabil","tag-infractiune-provocata","tag-neaudierea-denuntatorului"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4846"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4846\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}