{"id":4674,"date":"2021-12-21T09:48:06","date_gmt":"2021-12-21T09:48:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=4674"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:32","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:32","slug":"cjue-dreptul-uniunii-se-opune-aplicarii-unei-jurisprudente-a-curtii-constitutionale-in-masura-in-care-aceasta-coroborata-cu-dispozitiile-nationale-in-materie-de-prescriptie-creeaza-un-risc-sistemic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/cjue-dreptul-uniunii-se-opune-aplicarii-unei-jurisprudente-a-curtii-constitutionale-in-masura-in-care-aceasta-coroborata-cu-dispozitiile-nationale-in-materie-de-prescriptie-creeaza-un-risc-sistemic\/","title":{"rendered":"CJUE. Dreptul Uniunii se opune aplic\u0103rii unei jurispruden\u021be a Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care aceasta, coroborat\u0103 cu dispozi\u021biile na\u021bionale \u00een materie de prescrip\u021bie, creeaz\u0103 un risc sistemic de impunitate."},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Dreptul Uniunii se opune aplic\u0103rii unei jurispruden\u021be a Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care aceasta, coroborat\u0103 cu dispozi\u021biile na\u021bionale \u00een materie de prescrip\u021bie, creeaz\u0103 un risc sistemic de impunitate<\/em> este concluzia la care a ajuns <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/\" target=\"_blank\">Curtea de Justi\u0163ie a Uniunii Europene<\/a> \u00een hot\u0103r\u00e2rea pronun\u0163at\u0103 ast\u0103zi, 21.12.2021, \u00een cauzele conexate C-357\/19 Euro Box Promotion \u0219i al\u021bii, C-379\/19 DNA &#8211; Serviciul Teritorial Oradea, C-547\/19 Asocia\u0163ia \u00ab Forumul Judec\u0103torilor din Rom\u00e2nia \u00bb, C-811\/19 FQ \u0219i al\u021bii \u0219i C-840\/19 NC, dup\u0103 cum s-a anun\u0163at \u00een <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/jcms\/upload\/docs\/application\/pdf\/2021-12\/cp210230ro.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">comunicatul publicat<\/a> de Curte.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Din punctul nostru de vedere, la o prim\u0103 analiz\u0103, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea este extrem de criticabil\u0103 at\u00e2t din perspectiva considerentelor, c\u00e2t \u015fi a celor statuate, \u00eentruc\u00e2t, pe de o parte pare s\u0103 afecteze grav elemente de suveranitate care nu au fost delegate Uniunii, iar pe de alt\u0103 parte pare s\u0103 afecteze previzibilitatea care trebuie s\u0103 caracterizeze normele de drept penal \u015fi desf\u0103\u015furarea procesului penal. Asupra acestor chestiuni vom reveni \u00een perioada urm\u0103toare, dup\u0103 o analiz\u0103 riguroas\u0103 a hot\u0103r\u00e2rii. P\u00e2n\u0103 atunci, trebuie remarcat faptul c\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea statueaz\u0103 urm\u0103toarele:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Dreptul Uniunii se opune aplic\u0103rii unei jurispruden\u021be a Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care aceasta, coroborat\u0103 cu dispozi\u021biile na\u021bionale \u00een materie de prescrip\u021bie, creeaz\u0103 un risc sistemic de impunitate;<\/li><li>Suprema\u021bia dreptului Uniunii impune ca judec\u0103torii na\u021bionali s\u0103 aib\u0103 puterea s\u0103 lase neaplicat\u0103 o decizie a unei cur\u021bi constitu\u021bionale care este contrar\u0103 acestui drept, \u00een special f\u0103r\u0103 a fi expu\u0219i riscului de a le fi angajat\u0103 r\u0103spunderea disciplinar\u0103;<\/li><li>Dreptul Uniunii se opune aplic\u0103rii unei jurispruden\u021be a Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale care conduce la anularea hot\u0103r\u00e2rilor pronun\u021bate de completuri de judecat\u0103 nelegal compuse, \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care aceasta, coroborat\u0103 cu dispozi\u021biile na\u021bionale \u00een materie de prescrip\u021bie, creeaz\u0103 un risc sistemic de impunitate a faptelor care constituie infrac\u021biuni grave de fraud\u0103 care aduce atingere intereselor financiare ale Uniunii sau de corup\u021bie;<\/li><li>Dreptul Uniunii nu se opune ca deciziile Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale s\u0103 fie obligatorii pentru instan\u021bele de drept comun, cu condi\u021bia ca independen\u021ba acestei cur\u021bi, \u00een special fa\u021b\u0103 de puterile legislativ\u0103 \u0219i executiv\u0103, s\u0103 fie garantat\u0103. \u00cen schimb, acest drept se opune ca r\u0103spunderea disciplinar\u0103 a judec\u0103torilor na\u021bionali s\u0103 fie angajat\u0103 prin orice nerespectare a unor asemenea decizii;<\/li><li>Principiul suprema\u021biei dreptului Uniunii se opune ca instan\u021bele na\u021bionale s\u0103 nu poat\u0103, cu riscul aplic\u0103rii unor sanc\u021biuni disciplinare, s\u0103 lase neaplicate deciziile Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale contrare dreptului Uniunii;<\/li><\/ul>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dreptul Uniunii se opune aplic\u0103rii unei jurispruden\u021be a Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale \u00een m\u0103sura \u00een care aceasta, coroborat\u0103 cu dispozi\u021biile na\u021bionale \u00een materie de prescrip\u021bie, creeaz\u0103 un risc sistemic de impunitate este concluzia la care a ajuns Curtea de Justi\u0163ie a Uniunii Europene \u00een hot\u0103r\u00e2rea pronun\u0163at\u0103 ast\u0103zi, 21.12.2021, \u00een cauzele conexate C-357\/19 Euro Box Promotion \u0219i al\u021bii, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,85,84],"tags":[457,122,547,548,308,549,550,551,552,553,200,554,555,480,556],"class_list":["post-4674","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drept-penal","category-dreptul-uniunii-europene-reprezentare-in-fata-cjue","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice","tag-ccr","tag-cjue","tag-complete-specializate","tag-completuri-specializate","tag-curtea-constitutionala","tag-curtea-de-justietie-a-uniunii-europene","tag-dreptul-uniunii-europene","tag-impunitate","tag-interceptari","tag-jurisprudenta","tag-prescriptie","tag-raspunderea-disciplinara-a-judecatorilor","tag-suprematia-dreptului-ue","tag-ue","tag-uniunea-europeana"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4674","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4674"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4674\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4674"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4674"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4674"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}