{"id":4048,"date":"2020-05-27T20:37:54","date_gmt":"2020-05-27T20:37:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=4048"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:34","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:34","slug":"respingere-actiune-consiliul-judetean-cluj-contra-fost-presedinte","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/respingere-actiune-consiliul-judetean-cluj-contra-fost-presedinte\/","title":{"rendered":"Respingere ac\u0163iune a Consiliului Jude\u0163ean Cluj contra fostului pre\u015fedinte"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Curtea de Apel Cluj a respins definitiv ac\u0163iunea civil\u0103 \u00een r\u0103spundere patrimonial\u0103 formulat\u0103 de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cjcluj.ro\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Unitatea Administrativ\u0103 Teritorial\u0103 Jude\u0163ul Cluj<\/a> \u00een contradictoriu cu fostul pre\u015fedinte al Consiliului Jude\u0163ean Cluj, Horea Uioreanu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Prin ac\u0163iunea introductiv\u0103 de instan\u0163\u0103 formulat\u0103 \u00een luna decembrie 2018, Unitatea Administrativ Teritorial\u0103 Jude\u0163ul Cluj a solicitat angajarea r\u0103spunderii patrimoniale a p\u00e2r\u00e2tului, cu consecin\u0163a oblig\u0103rii acestuia la plata sumei de 165.044 lei \u015fi a dob\u00e2nzii legale aferente. \u00cen sus\u0163inerea preten\u0163iilor, reclamanta a imputat fostului Pre\u015fedinte al Consiliului Jude\u0163ean achizi\u0163ia unor servicii de expertizare tehnic\u0103, f\u0103r\u0103 concursul angaja\u0163ilor din aparatul de specialitate al Consiliului Jude\u0163ean Cluj, sus\u0163in\u00e2ndu-se cauzarea unui prejudiciu \u00een cuantum de 165.044 lei.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">De\u015fi ac\u0163iunea a fost introdus\u0103 pe rolul Judec\u0103toriei Cluj Napoca, ca urmare a admiterii excep\u0163iei necompeten\u0163ei materiale invocat\u0103 de p\u00e2r\u00e2t, cauza a fost declinat\u0103 spre competent\u0103 solu\u0163ionare Tribunalului Cluj, raporturile dintre pre\u015fedintele Consiliului Jude\u0163ean \u015fi unitatea administrativ-teritorial\u0103 fiind raporturi juridice de munc\u0103 <em>sui generis, <\/em>guvernate de legisla\u0163ia special\u0103 \u00een materie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Prin Sentin\u0163a civil\u0103 nr. 2772\/2019, pronun\u0163at\u0103 de Tribunalul Cluj \u00een \u015fedin\u0163a public\u0103 din 23 decembrie 2019, s-a dispus admiterea excep\u0163iei prescrip\u0163iei dreptului material la ac\u0163iune invocat\u0103 de fostul Pre\u015fedinte al Consiliului Jude\u0163ean \u015fi pe cale de consecin\u0163\u0103, s-a respins cererea de chemare \u00een judecat\u0103 formulat\u0103 de Unitatea Administrativ Teritorial\u0103 Jude\u0163ul Cluj.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cu toate acestea, anterior verific\u0103rii \u015fi pronun\u0163\u0103rii asupra excep\u0163iei prescrip\u0163iei dreptului material la ac\u0163iune, \u00een considerentele hot\u0103r\u00e2rii, Tribunalul Cluj a analizat \u00eendeplinirea condi\u0163iilor r\u0103spunderii civile patrimoniale a p\u00e2r\u00e2tului, concluzion\u00e2nd c\u0103 acesta ar fi r\u0103spunz\u0103tor pentru faptele imputate \u015fi prejudiciul pretins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cempotriva Sentin\u0163ei au formulat apel at\u00e2t Unitatea Administrativ Teritorial\u0103, c\u00e2t \u015fi Horea Uioreanu, acesta din urm\u0103 critic\u00e2nd hot\u0103r\u00e2rea instan\u0163ei de fond sub aspectul nelegalei pronun\u0163\u0103ri asupra \u00eentrunirii condi\u0163iilor r\u0103spunderii patrimoniale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Prin Decizia pronun\u0163at\u0103 \u00een \u015fedin\u0163a public\u0103 din 27 mai 2020, Curtea de Apel a respins ca nefondat apelul declarat de UAT Jude\u0163ul Cluj, \u015fi a admis apelul incident formulat de Horea Uioreanu \u00eempotriva considerentelor Sentin\u0163ei civile nr. 2772\/23.12.2019 a Tribunalului Cluj.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Astfel, schimb\u00e2nd \u00een parte considerentele instan\u0163ei de fond, Curtea de Apel Cluj a dispus \u00eenl\u0103turarea acelor considerente care vizeaz\u0103 fondul pricinii, respectiv statu\u0103rile asupra \u00eendeplinirii \u00een cauz\u0103 a condi\u0163iilor atragerii r\u0103spunderii civile patrimoniale a p\u00e2r\u00e2tului.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fostul Pre\u015fedinte al Consiliului Jude\u0163ean Cluj, Horea Uioreanu, a fost asistat \u00een cauz\u0103 de o echip\u0103 de avoca\u0163i din cadrul societ\u0103\u0163ii Chiri\u0163\u0103 \u015fi Asocia\u0163ii, format\u0103 din Anamaria Bota \u015fi Oana Chiri\u0163\u0103.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Curtea de Apel Cluj a respins definitiv ac\u0163iunea civil\u0103 \u00een r\u0103spundere patrimonial\u0103 formulat\u0103 de Unitatea Administrativ\u0103 Teritorial\u0103 Jude\u0163ul Cluj \u00een contradictoriu cu fostul pre\u015fedinte al Consiliului Jude\u0163ean Cluj, Horea Uioreanu. Prin ac\u0163iunea introductiv\u0103 de instan\u0163\u0103 formulat\u0103 \u00een luna decembrie 2018, Unitatea Administrativ Teritorial\u0103 Jude\u0163ul Cluj a solicitat angajarea r\u0103spunderii patrimoniale a p\u00e2r\u00e2tului, cu consecin\u0163a oblig\u0103rii [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":4051,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[87],"tags":[378,379,380,381,382],"class_list":["post-4048","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-contencios-administrativ","tag-actiune-civila","tag-consiliul-judetean-cluj","tag-horea-uioreanu","tag-raspundere-patrimoniala","tag-respingere"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4048","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4048"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4048\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4051"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4048"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4048"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4048"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}