{"id":2841,"date":"2019-02-19T12:06:16","date_gmt":"2019-02-19T12:06:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=2841"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:37","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:37","slug":"cedo-condamnarea-penala-doi-fosti-preoti-pentru-exercitarea-fara-drept-unei-profesii-este-neproportionala","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/cedo-condamnarea-penala-doi-fosti-preoti-pentru-exercitarea-fara-drept-unei-profesii-este-neproportionala\/","title":{"rendered":"CEDO. Condamnarea penal\u0103 a doi fo\u015fti preo\u0163i pentru exercitarea f\u0103r\u0103 drept a unei profesii este nepropor\u0163ional\u0103."},"content":{"rendered":"

Prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea de ast\u0103zi, 19 februarie 2019, \u00een afacerea Tothpal \u015fi Szabo c. Rom\u00e2nia CEDO a stabilit c\u0103 este nejustificat\u0103 \u015fi lipsit\u0103 de propor\u0163ionalitate sanc\u0163ionarea penal\u0103 a dou\u0103 persoane care \u015fi-au pierdut statutul de preot prin decizii ale organelor ecleziastice, \u00eens\u0103 au continuat s\u0103 practice ritualuri religioase cu participarea unei p\u0103r\u0163i a enoria\u015filor.<\/p>\n

\u00cen fapt, cei doi reclaman\u0163i, preo\u0163i la un moment dat, au fost exclu\u015fi din r\u00e2ndurile bisericii din care f\u0103ceau parte, dup\u0103 proceduri de natur\u0103 disciplinar\u0103 determinate de anumite conflicte cu conducerea acelor institu\u0163ii ecleziastice. \u00cen ciuda acestui fapt, cei doi au continuat s\u0103 predice \u015fi s\u0103 \u00eendeplineasc\u0103 ritualuri de natur\u0103 religioas\u0103 (botez, cununie, \u00eenmorm\u00e2ntare etc.) \u2013 pentru o parte a enoria\u015filor care au dorit acest lucru. \u00cen urma unui proces penal, cei doi au fost condamna\u0163i la amenzi penale pentru exercitarea f\u0103r\u0103 drept a unei profesii.<\/p>\n

Curtea a considerat c\u0103 nu a existat nicio \u201enevoie social\u0103\u201d care s\u0103 justifice aceast\u0103 condamnare, c\u00e2t timp persoanele care au decis s\u0103 continue s\u0103 participe la slujbele oficiate de reclaman\u0163i au acelea\u015fi drepturi de natur\u0103 religioas\u0103 ca \u015fi cei care s-au supus deciziei Bisericii. Curtea a considerat c\u0103, sanc\u0163ion\u00e2nd penal reclaman\u0163ii, statul rom\u00e2n a ales \u00een locul persoanelor din comunitatea lor care este preotul pe care s\u0103 \u00eel urmeze, \u00eentr-o zon\u0103 extrem de privat\u0103, aceea a drepturilor de natur\u0103 religioas\u0103. \u00cen egal\u0103 m\u0103sur\u0103, Curtea a considerat c\u0103 sanc\u0163ionarea lor penal\u0103 este \u015fi lipsit\u0103 de propor\u0163ionalitate, dat fiind c\u0103 prin fapta lor nu s-a urm\u0103rit nici producerea unor consecin\u0163e juridice \u015fi nici nu a fost pus \u00een pericol vreo persoan\u0103 sau grup de persoane.<\/p>\n

Hot\u0103r\u00e2rea Cur\u0163ii, \u00een limba francez\u0103, este disponibil\u0103 aici<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea de ast\u0103zi, 19 februarie 2019, \u00een afacerea Tothpal \u015fi Szabo c. Rom\u00e2nia CEDO a stabilit c\u0103 este nejustificat\u0103 \u015fi lipsit\u0103 de propor\u0163ionalitate sanc\u0163ionarea penal\u0103 a dou\u0103 persoane care \u015fi-au pierdut statutul de preot prin decizii ale organelor ecleziastice, \u00eens\u0103 au continuat s\u0103 practice ritualuri religioase cu participarea unei p\u0103r\u0163i a enoria\u015filor. \u00cen fapt, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[83,11,84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2841","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reprezentare-in-fata-cedo","category-drept-penal","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2841","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2841"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2841\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2841"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2841"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2841"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}