\u00cen data de 12 decembrie 2018, prin Decizia penal\u0103 nr. 1480\/A\/2018 pronun\u0163at\u0103 \u00een dosarul penal nr. 1038\/117\/2011, Curtea de Apel Cluj a decis c\u0103 \u00een cazul \u00een care judecata \u00een fond s-a realizat \u00een lipsa unor inculpa\u0163i afla\u0163i \u00een stare de de\u0163inere \u00een str\u0103in\u0103tate, este incident cazul de nulitate absolut\u0103 prev\u0103zut la art. 281 alin. (1) lit. e) din Codul de Procedur\u0103 Penal\u0103, aspect care a determinat desfiin\u0163area \u00een \u00eentregime a Sentin\u0163ei pronun\u0163ate \u015fi trimiterea cauzei spre rejudecare instan\u0163ei de fond.<\/p>\n
\u00cen fapt, s-a constatat faptul c\u0103 \u00een fa\u0163a primei instan\u0163e la unele \u015fedin\u0163e de judecat\u0103 \u00a0s-a procedat la administrarea unor probe fa\u0163\u0103 de anumi\u0163i inculpa\u0163i aresta\u0163i \u00een str\u0103in\u0103tate, precum \u015fi c\u0103 dezbaterile pe fondul cauzei s-au desf\u0103\u015furat f\u0103r\u0103 prezen\u0163a acestor persoane, dat fiind faptul c\u0103 ace\u015ftia se aflau \u00een centre de deten\u0163ie din Fran\u0163a.<\/p>\n
Instan\u0163a de apel a precizat faptul c\u0103 \u00eendeplinirea procedurii de citare cu persoanele aflate \u00een stare de de\u0163inere nu acoper\u0103 sanc\u0163iunea nulit\u0103\u0163ii absolute const\u00e2nd \u00een \u00eenc\u0103lcarea dispozi\u0163iilor privind prezen\u0163a obligatorie a inculpatului la judecat\u0103 atunci c\u00e2nd se afl\u0103 \u00een stare de de\u0163inere.<\/p>\n
De asemenea, astfel cum inculpatul T.I. a precizat prin intermediul motivelor de apel depuse la dosar, instan\u0163a a constatat faptul c\u0103 de\u015fi inculpa\u0163ii lips\u0103 au avut ap\u0103r\u0103tori ale\u015fi \u00een cauz\u0103, aceast\u0103 circumstan\u0163\u0103 nu este de natur\u0103 s\u0103 suplineasc\u0103 absen\u0163a lor fizic\u0103 de la proces \u015fi s\u0103 \u00eenl\u0103ture astfel obliga\u0163ia instan\u0163ei de a lua m\u0103surile legale pentru participarea lor la \u015fedin\u0163ele de judecat\u0103.<\/p>\n
Pe cale de consecin\u0163\u0103, Curtea de Apel Cluj a stabilit prin aceast\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2re faptul c\u0103 participarea la proces a inculpa\u0163ilor priva\u0163i de libertate este obligatorie, fie ea chiar \u015fi prin videoconferin\u0163\u0103, indiferent dac\u0103 locul de deten\u0163ie se afl\u0103 \u00een Rom\u00e2nia sau \u00een str\u0103in\u0103tate, singura excep\u0163ie fiind reprezentat\u0103 de cazul \u00een care inculpatul a solicitat judecarea cauzei \u00een lips\u0103.<\/p>\n
Ap\u0103rarea inculpatului T.I. \u00een apel a fost realizat\u0103 de echipa de avoca\u0163i din cadrul SCA Chiri\u0163\u0103 \u015fi asocia\u0163ii<\/strong> format\u0103 din Radu Chiri\u0163\u0103, Florin Mircea \u015fi Claudiu Bein\u015fan.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u00cen data de 12 decembrie 2018, prin Decizia penal\u0103 nr. 1480\/A\/2018 pronun\u0163at\u0103 \u00een dosarul penal nr. 1038\/117\/2011, Curtea de Apel Cluj a decis c\u0103 \u00een cazul \u00een care judecata \u00een fond s-a realizat \u00een lipsa unor inculpa\u0163i afla\u0163i \u00een stare de de\u0163inere \u00een str\u0103in\u0103tate, este incident cazul de nulitate absolut\u0103 prev\u0103zut la art. 281 alin. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2814","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drept-penal","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2814","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2814"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2814\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2814"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2814"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2814"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}