\u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie \u2013 Completul competent s\u0103 judece recursul \u00een interesul legii s-a pronun\u0163at ast\u0103zi, 16.10.2017, cu privire la recursul \u00een interesul legii declarat de Curtea de Apel Bra\u015fov viz\u00e2nd obliga\u0163ia organelor judiciare de a dispune m\u0103suri asiguratorii \u00een cauzele penale aflate \u00een faza de judecat\u0103 \u00een ipoteza \u00een care din verific\u0103rile efectuate rezult\u0103 ca inculpatul nu are nici un bun \u00een proprietate.<\/p>\n
Curtea de Apel Bra\u015fov a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 problema se pune \u00een acele situa\u0163ii \u00een care persoana v\u0103t\u0103mat\u0103 este o persoan\u0103 lipsit\u0103 de capacitate de exerci\u0163iu ori \u00een ipoteza infrac\u0163iunilor prev. de Legea 241\/2004 \u00een care exist\u0103 art. 11 ce impune obliga\u0163ia instituirii m\u0103surilor asiguratorii. \u00cen acela\u015fi sens, Curtea de Apel a mai indicat cu titlu exemplificativ dispozi\u0163iile art. 32-33 din Legea 656\/2002 \u015fi art. 20 din Legea 78\/2000.<\/p>\n
Cu alte cuvinte, se pune \u00eentrebarea dac\u0103 \u00een aceste situa\u0163ii exist\u0103 o facultate ori o obliga\u0163ie a instan\u0163ei de a dispune m\u0103surile asiguratorii, dac\u0103 inculpatul nu dispune de bunuri.<\/p>\n
Astfel, s-a ar\u0103tat c\u0103 \u00een practica Cur\u0163ii de Apel Bra\u015fov s-au conturat dou\u0103 opinii. Prima \u00een sensul c\u0103 pentru a se dispune m\u0103sura asiguratorii se impune ca inculpatul s\u0103 aib\u0103 aceste bunuri, verificare care cade \u00een sarcina instan\u0163ei. \u00centr-o a doua opinie s-a stabilit c\u0103 nu se impune judec\u0103torului obliga\u0163ia de a efectua verific\u0103ri cu privire la bunurile aflate \u00een patrimoniul inculpatului \u00eentruc\u00e2t m\u0103surile asiguratorii se pot dispune asupra tuturor bunurilor mobile \u015fi imobile ale inculpatului, \u00een mod generic, p\u00e2n\u0103 la concuren\u0163a probabil\u0103 a prejudiciului chiar \u015fi atunci c\u00e2nd acesta nu are nici un bun \u00een patrimoniu.<\/p>\n
Prin Decizia nr.19 pronun\u0163at\u0103 la 16.10.2017 \u00een dosarul nr.1902\/1\/2017, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie a admis recursul \u00een interesul legii \u015fi a stabilit c\u0103: \u201eAtunci c\u00e2nd se instituie m\u0103suri asigur\u0103torii \u00een procesul penal, nu este necesar s\u0103 se indice sau s\u0103 se dovedeasc\u0103 ori s\u0103 se individualizeze bunurile asupra c\u0103rora se \u00eenfiin\u0163eaz\u0103 m\u0103sura asigur\u0103torie<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie \u2013 Completul competent s\u0103 judece recursul \u00een interesul legii s-a pronun\u0163at ast\u0103zi, 16.10.2017, cu privire la recursul \u00een interesul legii declarat de Curtea de Apel Bra\u015fov viz\u00e2nd obliga\u0163ia organelor judiciare de a dispune m\u0103suri asiguratorii \u00een cauzele penale aflate \u00een faza de judecat\u0103 \u00een ipoteza \u00een care din verific\u0103rile […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drept-penal","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1584"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1584\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}