{"id":1536,"date":"2016-03-01T15:33:24","date_gmt":"2016-03-01T15:33:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=794"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:40","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:40","slug":"9-ore-de-asteptat-pe-hol-la-dna-constituie-privare-de-libertate-contrara-conventiei","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/9-ore-de-asteptat-pe-hol-la-dna-constituie-privare-de-libertate-contrara-conventiei\/","title":{"rendered":"9 ore de a\u015fteptat pe hol la DNA constituie privare de libertate. Contrar\u0103 Conven\u0163iei."},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea Popoviciu c. Rom\u00e2niei pronun\u0163at\u0103 ast\u0103zi, 1 martie 2015, CEDO a stabilit c\u0103 cele 9 ore pe care reclamantul le-a petrecut pe holurile DNA \u00eentre momentul \u00een care a fost dus cu mandat de aducere \u015fi momentul la care a fost re\u0163inut constituie o privare de libertate, contrar\u0103 prevederilor art. 5 paragraful 1 din Conven\u0163ie. Curtea european\u0103 a considerat c\u0103, de\u015fi reclamantul nu a fost \u00eenc\u0103tu\u015fat \u015fi nici \u00eenchis \u00een vreo celul\u0103, este nerealistic s\u0103 consider\u0103m c\u0103 acesta era liber s\u0103 p\u0103r\u0103seasc\u0103 sediul DNA f\u0103r\u0103 consecin\u0163e, cu at\u00e2t mult cu c\u00e2t a fost \u00een permanen\u0163\u0103 \u00eenso\u0163it de poli\u0163i\u015fti. \u00centruc\u00e2t nu exist\u0103 nicio justificare pentru care reclamantului nu i s-au adus la cuno\u015ftin\u0163\u0103 \u00eenvinuirile \u015fi nu a fost re\u0163inut la momentul la care a ajuns la sediul parchetului, Curtea a considerat c\u0103 a existat o violare a dreptului s\u0103u la libertate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Textul integral al hot\u0103r\u00e2rii CEDO este disponibil \u00een limba englez\u0103 la\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-160997\">http:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/eng?i=001-160997<\/a>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Prin hot\u0103r\u00e2rea Popoviciu c. Rom\u00e2niei pronun\u0163at\u0103 ast\u0103zi, 1 martie 2015, CEDO a stabilit c\u0103 cele 9 ore pe care reclamantul le-a petrecut pe holurile DNA \u00eentre momentul \u00een care a fost dus cu mandat de aducere \u015fi momentul la care a fost re\u0163inut constituie o privare de libertate, contrar\u0103 prevederilor art. 5 paragraful 1 din [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[83,11,84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1536","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reprezentare-in-fata-cedo","category-drept-penal","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1536","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1536"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1536\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1536"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1536"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1536"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}