{"id":1524,"date":"2015-09-13T10:17:19","date_gmt":"2015-09-13T10:17:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=752"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:40","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:40","slug":"tardivitatea-invocarii-exceptiei-necompetentei-generale-a-instantelor-judecatoresti","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/tardivitatea-invocarii-exceptiei-necompetentei-generale-a-instantelor-judecatoresti\/","title":{"rendered":"Tardivitatea invoc\u0103rii excep\u0163iei necompeten\u0163ei generale a instan\u0163elor judecatore\u015fti"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tardivitatea invoc\u0103rii excep\u0163iei necompeten\u0163ei generale a instan\u0163elor judecatore\u015fti<\/strong><\/p>\n

Potrivit art.553 C.proc.civil\u0103, \u00eencheierea unei conven\u0163ii arbitrale exclude, pentru litigiul care face obiectul ei, competen\u0163a instan\u0163elor judec\u0103tore\u015fti.<\/p>\n

Din moment ce tribunalul arbitral nu face parte din categoria instan\u0163elor judec\u0103tore\u015fti, rezult\u0103 c\u0103 necompeten\u0163a instan\u0163ei judec\u0103tore\u015fti \u00een acest caz este general\u0103 \u015fi de ordine public\u0103.<\/p>\n

Cu toate c\u0103, potrivit art. 130 alin 1 C.proc.civil\u0103\u00a0 excep\u0163ia va putea fi invocat\u0103 de c\u0103tre oricare dintre p\u0103r\u0163i sau de c\u0103tre instan\u0163\u0103 din oficiu \u201e\u00een orice stare a pricinii<\/em>\u201d , \u00een cazul conven\u0163iei arbitrale, instan\u0163a \u00ee\u015fi verific\u0103 competen\u0163a numai la cererea p\u0103r\u0163ilor.<\/p>\n

Instan\u0163a de judecat\u0103 va putea respinge excep\u0163ia necompeten\u0163ei chiar \u015fi \u00een prezen\u0163a unei conven\u0163ii arbitrale, dac\u0103 se afl\u0103 \u00een prezen\u0163a vreunuia dintre cazurile expres \u015fi limitativ prev\u0103zute de art. 554 alin 2 C.proc.civil\u0103.<\/p>\n

Asemenea caracteristici apropie norma de competen\u0163\u0103 din procedura arbitral\u0103 de normele dispozitive, ceea ce \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103, din aceast\u0103 perspectiv\u0103, competen\u0163a este relativ\u0103[1]<\/a>.<\/p>\n

A\u015fa se explic\u0103 c\u0103, de\u015fi ne afl\u0103m \u00een cazul unei competen\u0163e generale a instan\u0163elor judec\u0103tore\u015fti, nici termenul de invocare a excep\u0163iei nu r\u0103m\u00e2ne acela\u015fi ca cel prev\u0103zut de dispozi\u0163iile art. 130 alin 1 C.pr.civil\u0103, ci, excep\u0163ia va putea fi respins\u0103 ca tardiv\u0103.<\/p>\n

\u00cen spe\u0163\u0103, \u00een faza de regularizare a cererii, p\u00e2r\u00e2tul depune \u00eent\u00e2mpinare prin care invoc\u0103 respingerea cererii de chemare \u00een judecat\u0103 ca ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103. La primul termen de judecat\u0103 reclamanta \u00ee\u015fi precizeaz\u0103 ac\u0163iunea \u015fi instan\u0163a am\u00e2n\u0103 cauza \u00een vederea comunic\u0103rii preciz\u0103rii de ac\u0163iune c\u0103tre p\u00e2r\u00e2t, \u00een vederea formul\u0103rii \u00eent\u00e2mpin\u0103rii.<\/p>\n

La al doilea termen de judecat\u0103, p\u00e2r\u00e2tul invoc\u0103 prin \u00eent\u00e2mpinare excep\u0163ia necompeten\u0163ei generale a instan\u0163ei judec\u0103tore\u015fti, pe motiv c\u0103, \u00een contractul de subantrepriz\u0103 \u00eencheiat cu reclamanta, ar fi fost inserat\u0103 o clauz\u0103 compromisorie. Potrivit acestei clauze, dac\u0103 dup\u0103 15 zile de la \u00eenceperea tratativelor neoficiale, antreprenorul general \u015fi subantreprenorul nu reusesc s\u0103 rezolve amiabil o divergen\u0163\u0103 contractual\u0103, fiecare poate solicita ca disputa s\u0103 se solu\u0163ioneze prin arbitraj la CCIA Cluj. Solu\u0163ia pronun\u0163at\u0103 este definitiv\u0103 \u015fi executorie. <\/em><\/p>\n

Prin \u00eencheierea de \u015fedin\u0163\u0103 din data de 08.09.2015, Judec\u0103toria Cluj Napoca respinge ca tardiv\u0103 excep\u0163ia necompeten\u0163ei invocate \u015fi re\u0163ine spre solu\u0163ionare cauza.<\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> M. T\u0103b\u00e2rc\u0103, Drept procesual civil, Vol. II, ed. Universul Juridic, Bucure\u015fti, 2008, pag. 306<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tardivitatea invoc\u0103rii excep\u0163iei necompeten\u0163ei generale a instan\u0163elor judecatore\u015fti Potrivit art.553 C.proc.civil\u0103, \u00eencheierea unei conven\u0163ii arbitrale exclude, pentru litigiul care face obiectul ei, competen\u0163a instan\u0163elor judec\u0103tore\u015fti. Din moment ce tribunalul arbitral nu face parte din categoria instan\u0163elor judec\u0103tore\u015fti, rezult\u0103 c\u0103 necompeten\u0163a instan\u0163ei judec\u0103tore\u015fti \u00een acest caz este general\u0103 \u015fi de ordine public\u0103. Cu toate c\u0103, potrivit […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1524","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-litigii-comerciale"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1524","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1524"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1524\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1524"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1524"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1524"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}