{"id":1521,"date":"2015-08-19T14:18:41","date_gmt":"2015-08-19T14:18:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chirita-law.com\/?p=717"},"modified":"2025-12-29T09:47:40","modified_gmt":"2025-12-29T07:47:40","slug":"intaietatea-calitatii-de-martor-fata-de-cea-de-reprezentant-al-partii-civile-audierea-ca-martor-al-administratorului-societatii-prejudiciate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/intaietatea-calitatii-de-martor-fata-de-cea-de-reprezentant-al-partii-civile-audierea-ca-martor-al-administratorului-societatii-prejudiciate\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00cent\u00e2ietatea calit\u0103\u0163ii de martor fa\u0163\u0103 de cea de reprezentant al p\u0103r\u0163ii civile. Audierea ca martor al administratorului societ\u0103\u0163ii prejudiciate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Potrivit articolului 114 alin. (3) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103, calitatea de martor are \u00eent\u00e2ietate fa\u0163\u0103 de calitatea de reprezentant al uneia dintre p\u0103r\u0163i sau al unui subiect procesual principal cu privire la faptele \u015fi \u00eemprejur\u0103rile de fapt pe care persoana le-a cunoscut \u00eenainte de a dob\u00e2ndi aceast\u0103 calitate.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Calitatea de reprezentant poate fi dob\u00e2ndit\u0103, \u00eens\u0103, doar dup\u0103 \u00eenceperea urm\u0103ririi penale \u00eentruc\u00e2t doar dup\u0103 acest moment se dob\u00e2nde\u015fte \u015fi calitatea de subiect procesual sau de parte \u00een procesul penal. \u00cen consecin\u0163\u0103, reprezentantul unei societ\u0103\u0163i va fi audiat \u00een calitate de martor cu privire la faptele \u015fi \u00eemprejur\u0103rile pe care le-a cunoscut \u00eenainte de demararea procesului penal, chiar dac\u0103 de\u0163inea calitatea de administrator al societ\u0103\u0163ii la momentul \u00een care a luat cuno\u015ftin\u0163\u0103 de acestea.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen spe\u0163\u0103, inculpa\u0163ii au fost acuza\u0163i de s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015firea infrac\u0163iunii de furt calificat const\u00e2nd \u00een aceea c\u0103, \u00een anul 2006, f\u0103r\u0103 permisiunea sau cuno\u015ftin\u0163a lui B.G., administratorul societ\u0103\u0163ii G., au sustras mai multe utilaje din diferite parcuri de\u0163inute de societate. \u00cen cursul urm\u0103ririi penale, B.G. a fost audiat \u00een calitate de reprezentant al p\u0103r\u0163ii civile cu privire la raporturile comerciale dintre societatea G. \u015fi societ\u0103\u0163ile administrate de inculpa\u0163i \u015fi la \u00eemprejur\u0103rile \u00een care au fost ridicate bunurile din parcurile societ\u0103\u0163ii G.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen cursul judec\u0103\u0163ii \u00een prim\u0103 instan\u0163\u0103, prin \u00eencheierea din data de 14.11.2014, Tribunalul Bihor a dispus audierea lui B.G. \u00een calitate de martor \u00een temeiul art. 114 alin. (3) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103, re\u0163in\u00e2nd c\u0103 aceast\u0103 calitate are \u00eent\u00e2ietate fa\u0163\u0103 de cea de reprezentant al p\u0103r\u0163ii civile.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Potrivit articolului 114 alin. (3) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103, calitatea de martor are \u00eent\u00e2ietate fa\u0163\u0103 de calitatea de reprezentant al uneia dintre p\u0103r\u0163i sau al unui subiect procesual principal cu privire la faptele \u015fi \u00eemprejur\u0103rile de fapt pe care persoana le-a cunoscut \u00eenainte de a dob\u00e2ndi aceast\u0103 calitate. Calitatea de reprezentant poate fi dob\u00e2ndit\u0103, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,84],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1521","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drept-penal","category-white-collar-infractiuni-economice"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1521","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1521"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1521\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1521"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1521"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chirita-law.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1521"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}